Friday, February 20, 2009

"You've Just Entered the No-Spin Zone"- Looking at American Politics through the Eyes of a Different "News"

After watching 19 installments of The Colbert Report's 434 part series- Better Know a District, I couldn't help but wonder where Colbert gets his inspiration. Shortly thereafter, I learned that his highly successful satire is actually aimed at Fox News correspondent and top-rated personality, Bill O'Reilly. When Colbert asks, "George Bush- great president? or the greatest president?" he is making an attack on O'Reilly's obivious preference of the Republican party. Colbert's not the only one- people all over criticize O'Reilly's hit show, The O'Reilly Factor, and Fox News in particular for its conservative perspective. Ideally, we want our media to be unbiased, but part of the Daily Me that Sunstein describes in Web 2.0, suggests we actually seek out news programs that cater to our beliefs. The reality is that no news program, or any media outlet, is really unbiased. Fox News happens to get a lot of heat because it opposes the established liberal bias in the media. We live in a world where bipartisan politics dominate the conversation- it's much easier to choose one side than to get caught in the middle. Bill O'Reilly and Steve Colbert each present the issues, but it's hard to overlook their subliminal agendas. O'Reilly uses intimidation, Colbert uses humor, but both get their point across to the people that want to hear it. The fire that Fox has come under for its support of O'Reilly is explored in an article posted on politico.com in late November, entitled "Murdoch 'absolutely despises' O'Reilly" http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/1108/Wolff_Murdoch_absolutely_despises_OReilly_.html. Murdoch, the global media mogul and Chairman of News Corp. (in charge of Fox News), "despises the bullying, mean-spirited, hugely successful evening commentator". Even the CEO of Fox News disproves of O'Reilly- so the obvious question is: Why is he still on the air? One word- money. O'Reilly's show is the #1 cable news show and is responsible for bringing in a remarkable 4 million viewers on an average weeknight. That translates to a lot of advertising and a lot of exposure for all of News Corp's subsidiaries. Born a businessman, Murdoch knows this, and his belief in a reasonable rate of return trumps any tastelessness that might come from Fox News through Bill O'Reilly. Fiorina looked at the big picture- only 3% of Bush voters in the 2004 election actually watched O'Reilly. This suggests that his influence isn't that far reaching. Still, his biased reporting turns heads in the public sector since Americans still hold onto the fallacy that the news is objective. Murdoch alluded to something that has changed in the past few decades. News has become a business. When there's money to be made, antiquated values are easily compromised. Would you rather make millions of dollars or promote fair journalism? O'Reilly is virtually untouchable because of the revenue he generates and the personality that even those people at Fox seem to hate, is responsible for all that. His willingness to endlessly defend his conservative beliefs about immigration, religion, left-wing politicians, etc. in "The No-Spin Zone" puts him in a love/hate relationship with America public. In addition to becoming a business, the news has also become a form of entertainment. O'Reilly's fiery temper is undeniably entertaining- much like Colbert's ability to convey satire through humor. People look at the news differently, and it is impossible to overlook the effect that this shift is having on American politics.

2 comments:

Carl Forziati said...

Really...you having nothing to say? Well, let me elaborate. But first, you have to check out this youtube video- it says it all!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X9agKJUqq44
Lil' Bill O'Reilly addresses bipartisan politics, homosexuality, and the war in Iraq. 3 major issues all brought up in an incredibly blatant political satire. You would think Bill O'Reilly would be upset that he was caricatured to represent nothing more than a narrow-minded biggot. When asked about it, he didn't give a comment. Wanna know why? It has a lot to do with which television network aired that video. It was shot for a late night comedy show called Talk Show with Spike Feresten. Before it was even released on the air, it was leaked to every viral video site and is now an Internet sensation. If any of you are avid late night television surfers- you'd know that Spike's show is a Fox exclusive. Little ironic don't you think? I can't imagine bashing your own news commentator could be good for ratings. I thought it was all about ratings [and money], Mr. Murdoch? I looked into it further and couldn't find any information to support the idea that it was a subliminal message sent from the higher-ups at Fox who want O'Reilly off but can't actually sever their ties with him- but I think this is pretty obvious. The video also makes an attempt to re-establish Fox as a trusted media brand, especially since it has come under more and more scrutiny. Though Fox prides itself on taking a different approach to the News, it still can't afford being associated with the image that O'Reilly conveys.

I have to go now...the O'Reilly Factor is coming on.

Corey Imbriaco said...

In response to your post, one part that jumped out at me, mainly due to personal experiences, was about the entertainment value of O'Reilly and his bad temper. It reminded me of a certain Jim Cramer, the loud, obnoxious, and crazy host of Mad Money. My stepfather loves stocks and this is his favorite show. I shouldn't say that I enjoy the show because I rarely watch it, but whenever I walk by the living room and see my stepfather watching it, I can't help but sit down on the couch and watch. I can't believe that this "lunatic" is permitted to have his own television show and give advice to people about stocks. A man who jumps around his stage while constantly yelling and occasionally throwing things around does not seem like the kind of guy I would want to take stock advice from. However, him being able to get me to sit down and watch his show, even though stocks don't exactly perk my interest, is exactly why he is on the air in the first place. In my eyes, it's the same deal with O'Reilly. Even if you don't necessarily tune in to watch him all the time, if you happen to come in contact with one of his shows, chances are you are going to tune in again, if not just to see how he's going to act and what he's going to bash that night. As the CEO of Fox News, would you rather have O'Reilly and all the attention his show brings, or another "average-Joe"-host with his show that is indistinguishable from the others? If I'm the CEO of Fox News, I would take the money and deal with O'Reilly in a heartbeat.